Known Errors & Comments
Last updated 24JN2016
p. 12, Eq. 1.11: The dv at the end still has three components and might be written as d3v. The same is true in Eq. 1.12.
pp. 12 & 13: One may wish to call v1, v2, and v3 speeds instead of velocities.
p. 23, top line: replace the word probably with probable.
p. 28, Fig. 2.1: The star convolution sign between the top and middle panels should be a multiplications sign.
p. 40, Fig. 2.8: The star convolution sign between the Shaw function and F(x) to the left should be a multiplication sign.
p. 75, third paragraph, first line: should read λ/Δλ = 105.
p. 120, following Eq. 6.4: The numerical value of sigma should be 5.67040 x 105 or 108 to be consistent with the more correct value in Appendix A.
p. 131, Eq. 7.8: The integration variable at the end should be tν not τν.
p. 142, four lines after Eq. 7.37: The density units should be g/cm3.
p. 149, last text line before Eq. 8.1: (1.16) should be (1.17).
p. 150, third line of text: Delete the I2 in (hRc/I2).
p. 150, Eq. 8.3: For the best accuracy with numerical computation, one would normally use the more complete value of 13.598 eV instead of 3.60 eV, as in Appendix D.
p. 151, 8 lines up from bottom: 3746 should read 3647.

p.152, Fig. 8.2: the Balmer limit is at 3647, not 3746.
p. 156: Top line says units are in 1018 cm2/H ion, so Equation 8.12 should include this factor, i.e., αbf from the polynomial, which goes with Figure 8.3, should be multiplied by 1018 before going into Equation 8.12.
p. 158, midpage, the polynomial for U1: place a minus sign in front of U1 so it reads U1 = 54.0532 ...
p. 159, Eq. 8.16: The polynomials fit John’s (1994) values that are in units of 1026 cm2 per ion, so multiply α(Heff) by 1026 before going into Equation 8.16.
p. 160, Fig. 8.5, panel (a) does not properly portray the H boundfree component. The correct version is:
p. 172, second line up from bottom: Magnetic pressure is B2/(8pi). The B values in Table 9.1 should be increased by 21/2.
p. 173. Eq. 9.2: The delete the exponent of ½ on t0 in the integrand. (A known error from the 2nd edition that did not get fixed.)
p. 188, line 67: The wavelengths are reversed, as is clear from Fig. 9.10.
p. 188, line 8: The sixth word is supposed to be depends.
p. 191, Fig. 9.13 caption: Insert: In these relatively cool models, the electron pressure rises rapidly in the deep layers, where the electron donors become more ionized.
p. 192, Fig. 9.14 caption: Replace with: Gas pressure and electron pressure are shown as a function of log tau0 for models having S0 = 2.0. For these relatively hot models, the electron donors are highly ionized resulting in Pe closely tracking Pg.
p. 194, Fig. 9.16: The heavy curve should be labeled 1, not 0.
p. 195, four equations starting with 9.24: replace the c0 symbols with the word constant. The point of these four equations is to specify the proportionality. The constant will be unique to each case.
p. 200, 2nd reference: should read Prieto not Preito.
p. 217, Fig. 10.10: H19 should be H9.
p. 218, top of page: Delete this sixline paragraph.
p. 224: The sign of the bolometric correction has not been consistently handled here. Keeping the negative convention shown in Fig. 10.16 and Eqs. 10.9 & 10.10 means that the sign of BC in Eqs. 10.7 & 10.8 should be reversed.
p. 246, last line of Fig 11.4 caption should read comparison.
p. 254, in the line of text above Eq. 11.42: insert the f for oscillator strength in the numerator of the fraction.
p. 255, Eq. 11.44: insert the convolution star between alpha(Stark) and alpha(v.d. Waals).
p. 258, Fig. 11.10: In the ordinate label, the a off to the left should be the second argument in H(u,a).
p. 261, line after Eq. 11.54: the exponent on 10 is not χλθ, but χλθ, i.e., the λ is a subscript, as in Eq. 11.54.
p. 321, Fig. 13.8 caption: should read Fe II, not Fe I.
p. 326, 4th line down: Figure 13.8 should be Figure 13.7.
p. 330, last line on the page: Delete the z at the start of the line.
p. 345, caption on Fig. 14.2: revised parallax is currently 130.23 mas, resulting in a photometric radius of 2.76 R⊙.
p. 349, Fig. 14.5: The ordinate label should be R in solar units, i.e., R/Rsun.
p. 353, Eq. 14.17: The >~ symbol near the end of the line should be <~ instead.
p. 358, 4th line: Should read “... such pairs in the spectra...”

p.383, last equation: The coefficient in front of (δP/P)2 should be 4, not d.
p. 400, Eq. 16.7: the signs of the log kappa and the deltathetachi terms should be +.
p. 409, Fig. 16.13: the solar point (circled dot) is missing and should be at Log A = 10.9, [Fe/H] = 0.
p. 435, second integral near the top of the page: the subscript on both instances of ζRT should be T, not R.
p. 448, Fig. 17.15, label toward the right: The ε in front of Eri has been lost.
p. 464, Eq. 18.10: The first set of integration limits should be changed from +R to +vL.
p. 465, par. 1, line 1: Should read, “We can evaluate G(Δλ)...”
p. 486, Fig. 18.22: The 5/3 at the end of the equation is supposed to be an exponent on the mass, as in Eq. 18.23.
p. 507, Table B.2: The effective temperatures for these giants come from Eq. 14.17 and should read as follows.
F0 0.31 7178
F2 0.36 6909
F5 0.44 6528
F8 0.54 6122
G0 0.64 5779
G2 0.76 5433
G5 0.90 5098
G8 0.96 4973
K0 1.03 4836
K2 1.18 4572
K3 1.29 4396
K5 1.44 4166
K7 1.53 4030
M0 1.57 3936
M2 1.60 3923:
M5 1.58 
p. 506 & 508: The correct reference for Perry et al. is 1987 Pub. Ast. Soc. Pacific 99, 1184.
 end 